Movie Review: The Hunger Games

At what age should children be allowed to see the movie, The Hungers Games?

Short answer:

It makes a huge world of difference if your child has read the book. If they have, it probably means your child is at least in third grade (almost 4th now). I would say that child should be fine. If they haven’t read the book, I would have reservations for anyone under 10 watching the movie because so much is explained in the book that would help guide a child’s understanding of the movie. When I asked my son if he thought it would be alright for his friends to watch, he said, “Sure. They play Call of Duty and Resident Evil.” (My son does not play Resident Evil.) I asked about the girls in his 5th grade class. He said maybe, it depends on who read the book.

In the end, you know your child best. For my children:

I would not let my 8 year-old second grader who has not read the book watch The Hunger Games. My 10-year old, yes. Mind you, I am not a parent who lets my sons watch every PG-13 movie. I still won’t let them watch The Dark Night, which I found infinitely darker and more disturbing than The Hunger Games. But at the same time, I took my older son to see the first Transformer’s movie when he was 6. I did not let him my younger son see a Transformer’s movie in the theater until he was 8 due to his mindset.

For a more in depth review of The Hunger Games and why I said what I said above read on:

(The long answer.)

There are three things to think about to determine if it’s appropriate for your child.

First, I think it is imperative that anyone who goes to watch the movie reads the book first. When trying to compress the book into a two-hour-and-twenty-minute movie, a lot needs to be cut. And with the book as detailed and layered as it is, many of the nuances will be lost on the audience who hasn’t read the book. For example, when Katniss tells Prim to mind her goat at a particularly moving scene so she can sell its milk for money, you will have no idea what she is talking about since this is the only mention of the goat in the entire movie. Or why is Haymitch a drunk? Or why doesn’t Katniss turn a cold shoulder to Peeta in the beginning? In the book, this is all explained very well.

Second, even having read the book there are subtleties only older children will understand. I was surprised that my 10 ½ year old completely misinterpreted two key scenes at the end of the movie. I give an example of one these at the end of this post, with warnings that it’s a spoiler alert.

Finally, the violence. Yes, it is kids killing kids. You can’t get around that. However, the director did a good job of making most of it brief, while still impressing on you the cruelness of it all. There were three fight images that are a little tough to watch knowing your child is sitting next to you, but my son didn’t seem distraught. And there is one scary “boo” moment, that did make my son jump, but you know exactly when that is going to happen.

***Spoiler alert***
When she shots Kato at the end to end his torment, he didn’t understand that it was an act of mercy. He thought Katniss killed him only because she could. Obvious too an adult, but not so obvious to a child.

In conclusion, I really enjoyed the movie and thought it was an excellent adaption of the book.

Movie Review: Transformers 3--For Kids?

My first inclination is to say, no. However, I went with 6 kids from 8 to 10 years old and they all said they liked it.

One ten-year-old said he liked it, but it was a little violent. This was the boy who had no problems with the first Transformers movie when he was 6 or the second one when he was 8. See my post from two years ago.

The problem with Transformers 3 was with was the way in which they depicted the violence.

I never knew one of the criticisms of the first two movies was that the violence needed to be more graphic, more visceral, because these two elements were definitely heightened.

There was no torture this time, and the first half of the movie was clean enough - actually I enjoyed it and the premise; it was the second half of the movie that ruined it for kids' parents:

-Suddenly, the robots bled red lubricant. If one got shot, lubricant went flying. When one got punched in the face, red lubricant poured out of its mouth. In the previous movies, it would be a few machine parts.
-Humans were literally blown apart. As in, let's watch one leg go this way and the other go that way. And when I say humans, it wasn’t just soldiers, but civilians (lots of them).
-There were a couple of graphic scenes of human corpses.
-Also, in the first movie, when Megaton ripped Jazz apart depicting how ruthless he was as the bad guy, it was shocking. Here the Autobots do it with relish to the Decepticons. Don’t get me wrong, the bad guys deserved bad things to happen to them, but suddenly there was no difference in the way either side fought-without remorse, hesitation, or mercy. Tearing an enemy limb from limb is tough to watch, and still wrong, whether it’s the good guys or bad guys doing it.

When I walked out of the theater and saw a little kid, no older than 6, in an Optimus Prime costume, and all the other young kids in line, I felt bad for their parents as they had no idea what they were about to have their children watch.

And before you say, “Hey, come on, it was rated PG-13, parents should know better,” walk into any Toys R Us or Target, and their shelves are filled with Transformers toys and clothing. Are you really saying all this merchandise is targeted to 13 year olds? The other two movies were also PG-13 and neither rose to quite this level of graphic violence.

Really, flying red lubricant? Come on.

Would I take my boys to see the movie again knowing what I know now? My ten year old yes, and probably my eight, because what 8- or 10-year-old boy isn’t dying to see it.

For some reason sequels tend to be darker, look at Harry Potter, it’s just a real bummer that Transformers 3 had to be like this.

(As an aside, the editing for THE BATTLE, basically the entire second half of the movie was horrible, with people, Autobots, and Decepticons popping up out of nowhere, then disappearing, and then finding themselves in unexplained situations. It seemed liked the editors had so much footage, they didn’t know what to stick in and cut out, and then stayed on some scenes way too long and others way too little. Really annoying. In my opinion this was the worst Transformers’ movie by far for even more reasons than I've explained already, but I can’t say more without being a spoiler.)